Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Blog #2


Free Blog #2
            I spent a lot of time trying to figure out what I wanted to write my free blog about. Being that I am going to school for nursing, I always keep my eye out for articles in the news that have to do with health or the medical field.  When I was in high school, I can remember that we had “brunch,” which was simply a passing period between classes around 10:30 am, and also a time for the school to sell food.  They offered processed food as well as food made in the cafeteria.  The food offered wasn’t healthy at all, and for this reason, I think that changes need to be made.  The changes need to start at the home, but if the parents are not willing to enforce the changes at home, maybe it would be wise for the government to step in and make changes?  “In order to prevent and reduce the number of children who experience childhood obesity, the government is trying to set nutritional standards for vending machines in addition to the cafeteria standards they have already set” (Nixon, 2012).  Because so many children are not bringing food from home and are eating food from vending machines, the Obama administration is concerned that “school vending machines stocked with potato chips, cookies, and sugary soft drinks contribute to childhood obesity, which has more than tripled in the past 30 years” (Nixon, 2012).  From what I’ve learned in class in relation to this article, “conservatives would prefer that free markets regulate the economy, not the government” (Newell, p. 104).  The conservatives would like the parents to regulate the issues of the cafeteria and the vending machines, and the government to stay out of the entire matter.  The liberals, on the other hand, have an entirely different opinion on the matter at hand.  They “put faith in the ability of government to direct economic activity.  Liberals also suggest government activity as the solution to market failure” (Newell, p. 104).  On this matter, I stand somewhere in the middle.   “What we have is a fragmented system where some schools do a good job of limiting access to junk food and others don’t” (Nixon, 2010).  This comment is entirely true, and what is needed is a consistent system so we don’t have schools and children that fall through the cracks and are consistently being feed junk food all the time.  In my opinion, I think that if the parents and administrators of the school are not taking care of the problems with the unhealthy eating, then something needs to be done, and the government might need to step in and do something.  Hopefully in the future we can see a combination of parents influencing their children to eat healthier, which will require less government influence, but if necessary, government might have to step in and do their part.

Bibliography
Newell, Prindle, Riddlesperger.  Texas Politics, 11th edition.  Wadsworth Cengage Learning.  2011

Nixon, Ron. "New Guidelines Planned on School Vending Machines." New York Times [New York] 12 02 2012, 12022012 n. pag. Web. 22 Feb. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/21/us/politics

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Blog #1

Rick Perry for President
    Promises, promises, promises.... This is what we hear during the election time from the candidate elects, and looking at what they have to say, we don’t really know what to believe.  I want to believe that “Rick Perry will get government out of the way so we can get America working again” (Rick Perry, 2012).  Health care is very near and dear to my heart, because I am going to be attending nursing school.  Perry’s view on health care is that we must stimulate the job field so more companies can provide health benefits for their employees (Rick Perry, 2012).  I think this is a brilliant idea, because if people are receiving health benefits through their employers, then maybe there would be a decrease in the amount of people receiving aid from the state and the federal agencies.  Rick Perry stands firmly on the idea of pro-life (Rick Perry, 2012).  It is my opinion that the mother should have the right to choose.  So it would be on this issue that I would be at odds with Mr. Perry.  I think it should be up to the woman to choose.  I know a friend who was faced with the issue of a lifetime, knowing that her baby would die shortly after birth.  She didn’t have an abortion because she didn’t believe it was the right thing to do, but I think it is so IMPORTANT that she have a CHOICE in the matter.  Her daughter died immediately after birth, which was very sad, but the situation was her choice.  I think as we look at the presidential candidates, we need to carefully look at their stands on social issues, and see what we believe in, and what the candidates believe in as well.


Works Cited 

"Rick Perry for President 2012." Rick Perry for President 2012. 16 Jan. 2012. Web. 04 Feb. 2012. <http://www.rickperry.org/issues/>.